Heritage v. Daniels

3 N.J.L. 551
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 15, 1809·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

— Both of these objections have been repeatedly adjudged sufficient gi-ound for the reversal of the judgment of the justice. Filing a note or other evidence of-a ground of action, is not filing a state of demand; nor had the justice legal evidence of the execution of the note, nor of the assignment. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heritage v. Daniels, 3 N.J.L. 551 (N.J. 1809).

3 N.J.L. 551 (Heritage v. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.