Heriot v. Haimovitz

109 So. 100, 91 Fla. 1009
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 1, 1926
StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 100 (Heriot v. Haimovitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heriot v. Haimovitz, 109 So. 100, 91 Fla. 1009 (Fla. 1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein sustaining demurrer to the Bill of Complaint, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order sustaining demurrer to the Bill of Com *1010 plaint; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the -Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 So. 100, 91 Fla. 1009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heriot-v-haimovitz-fla-1926.