Hering v. Hilton
140 N.E.2d 737, 13 Ill. App. 2d 132
Opinion
Mary E. Hering, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Garlin Hilton, Defendant-Appellant.
Illinois Appellate Court Third District.
*133 Young & Sullivan, and James E. Murphy, attorneys for Garlin Hilton, defendant-appellant.
Elliott B. Young, and John D. Sullivan, of counsel.
Lybarger & Collins, and Keith F. Scott, attorneys for Mary E. Hering, plaintiff-appellee.
(Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE REYNOLDS.
Reversed.
Not to be published in full.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hering v. Hilton, 140 N.E.2d 737, 13 Ill. App. 2d 132 (Ill. Ct. App. 1993).
140 N.E.2d 737 (Hering v. Hilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hering v. Hilton
140 N.E.2d 737 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1957)