Heretick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Heretick v. State

650 So. 2d 708, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1990, 1995 WL 80038

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 1995

DocketNo. 93-3122

StatusPublished

This text of 650 So. 2d 708 (Heretick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heretick v. State, 650 So. 2d 708, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1990, 1995 WL 80038 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction of false imprisonment but reverse his conviction for battery on the authority of Blanchard v. State, 634 So.2d 1118 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 641 So.2d 1344 (Fla.1994), and Chaeld v. State, 599 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

We find no error in the denial of the motion to suppress. See Owen v. State, 560 So.2d 207 (Fla.), cert. denied, 498 U.S: 855, 111 S.Ct. 152, 112 L.Ed.2d 118 (1990).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded to discharge the appellant as to the conviction for battery.

GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI