Heretick v. State
650 So. 2d 708, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1990, 1995 WL 80038
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction of false imprisonment but reverse his conviction for battery on the authority of Blanchard v. State, 634 So.2d 1118 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 641 So.2d 1344 (Fla.1994), and Chaeld v. State, 599 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
We find no error in the denial of the motion to suppress. See Owen v. State, 560 So.2d 207 (Fla.), cert. denied, 498 U.S: 855, 111 S.Ct. 152, 112 L.Ed.2d 118 (1990).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded to discharge the appellant as to the conviction for battery.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heretick v. State, 650 So. 2d 708, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1990, 1995 WL 80038 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
650 So. 2d 708 (Heretick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blanchard v. State
634 So. 2d 1118 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Owen v. State
560 So. 2d 207 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Chaeld v. State
599 So. 2d 1362 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
City of Seaford v. Delmarva Power & Light Co.
498 U.S. 855 (Supreme Court, 1990)