Hereth v. Yandes

Indiana Supreme Court

Hereth v. Yandes

34 Ind. 103

DecidedNovember 15, 1870

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Ind. 103 (Hereth v. Yandes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hereth v. Yandes, 34 Ind. 103 (Ind. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

Downey, J.

This was an action on a note, of the same date and form as the one in the case of the same appellants against Meyer, at the present term (33 Ind. 511).

The same defense was set up. There was a general verdict for the appellee, and a special finding also, in which the plaintiff was found to be an innocent holder of the note.

Judgment was rendered on the verdict. Motion for a new trial overruled. No bill of exceptions. There is nothing in the case for us to decide.

The judgment is affirmed, with two per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Downey, J.

This was an action on a note, of the same date and form as the one in the case of the same appellants against Meyer, at the present term (33 Ind. 511).

The same defense was set up. There was a general verdict for the appellee, and a special finding also, in which the plaintiff was found to be an innocent holder of the note.

Judgment was rendered on the verdict. Motion for a new trial overruled. No bill of exceptions. There is nothing in the case for us to decide.

The judgment is affirmed, with two per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Ind. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hereth-v-yandes-ind-1870.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack