Hereford v. Lake

15 La. Ann. 693
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedDecember 15, 1860
StatusPublished

This text of 15 La. Ann. 693 (Hereford v. Lake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hereford v. Lake, 15 La. Ann. 693 (La. 1860).

Opinion

Duffel, J.

This is an appeal taken from a judgment confirming a default.

The petition charges in substance, that George Wilson, R. P. Crump and William Lake, owners of the steamboat Grenada, are, m solido, indebted to tho petitioner, in the sum of $1000, the amount of a due bill annexed to tho petition and signed by W. P. Crump master of said boat, who was by the owners authorized to sign such bills.

The default was confirmed without any other evidence than the due bill, and it is contended, in this court, by the appellee, thafthe signature to the bill is that of the appellant R. P. Crump.

The pleadings should have been amended, or tho appellee should, at least, have adduced proof of tho facts now disclosed. Having- failed to do either, ho must be non-suited.

The decision in the ease of Davis, adm’x. v. Davis, 8 An. 91, is not applicable to the one at bar.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of tho District Court be reversed, and that ours be in favor of the appellants, as in case of non-suit, the plaintiff paying the costs of both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 La. Ann. 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hereford-v-lake-la-1860.