Hereford Ins. Co. v. A to Z Supply Servs., Inc.

2024 NY Slip Op 33545(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedOctober 7, 2024
DocketIndex No. 153731/2022
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 33545(U) (Hereford Ins. Co. v. A to Z Supply Servs., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hereford Ins. Co. v. A to Z Supply Servs., Inc., 2024 NY Slip Op 33545(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2024).

Opinion

Hereford Ins. Co. v A to Z Supply Servs., Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 33545(U) October 7, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 153731/2022 Judge: Judy H. Kim Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 153731/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 127 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/07/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. JUDY H. KIM PART 04 Justice ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------X INDEX NO. 153731/2022 HEREFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, MOTION DATE 09/22/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 004 - V -

A TO Z SUPPLY SERVICES, INC.,AUTUMN PT PC,CITIMED SURGERY CENTER, LLC,EMED PHARMACY CORP., EMOTE MEDICAL SERVICES, PC,EMUNA INC.,FRANKLIN SQUARE SERVICES, INC.,HEAL TH NEXUS, INC.,IMOVE PHYSICAL THERAPY, PC,INTERVENTIONAL PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHAB MEDICINE OF NEW YORK PLLC,KNAPP ORTHO DECISION + ORDER ON SERVICES, INC.,MARK H VINE, NY UNION PHARMACY, INC.,OLUBUSOLA BRIMMO, REFUAH DIAGNOSTIC MOTION LLC,SEDATION VACATION PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE, PLLC,TRI-BOROUGH NY MEDICAL PRACTICE, PC,UNISOFT LLC,WELLNESS MEDICAL IMAGING, PC,WIZARD COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.,DARIUS COVINGTON, LEONA STOKES, ORLANDO COVINGTON,

Defendants. ------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 004) 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 122, 123 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - DEFAULT

Upon the foregoing documents, plaintiffs motion for a default judgment is granted, in

part, to the extent set forth below.

Plaintiff commenced this action on April 29, 2022, seeking a declaratory judgment that it

is not obligated to pay no-fault benefits for any medical treatment defendants Darius Covington,

Orlando Covington and Leona Stokes received for injuries allegedly sustained in a motor vehicle

collision on November 15, 2021 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 1 [Complaint at ,J26]). Plaintiff now moves,

without opposition, for a default judgment against defendants: Caplet Pharmacy Inc; Downtown

Brooklyn PT, PC; Future Care Registered Professional Nursing PLLC d/b/a Future Care Internal

153731/2022 HEREFORD INSURANCE COMPANY vs. A TO Z SUPPLY SERVICES, INC. ET AL Page 1 of 5 Motion No. 004

1 of 5 [* 1] INDEX NO. 153731/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 127 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/07/2024

Medicine; All Health Dme Inc; Bingo Supplies Inc; Fontto Supply Services Inc; Glenmore

Medical, PC; Hunt Supply Inc; Lincoln Diagnostics; Lit Chemists Corp; Macintosh Medical, PC;

Open Acupuncture, PC; Rehab Concepts Physical Therapy PC; Samir Zaqdan a/k/a Samir

Mohamed Hanafy Zaqdan DPT; and Vargas Rx Corp d/b/a 14th St Pharmacy (collectively, the

"Defaulting Defendants"). Plaintiff argues that the motion should be granted because it has

established that defendant Leona Stokes breached a condition precedent to coverage by failing to

appear for several duly scheduled independent medical examinations and defendants Darius

Covington and Orlando Covington failed to subscribe their examinations under oath ("EUO")

transcripts, another condition precedent to coverage (Id. at ,J,J24, 33).

DISCUSSION

In order to establish a default judgment pursuant to CPLR 3215, plaintiff must submit proof

of: (1) service of the summons and complaint; (2) the facts constituting the claim; and (3)

defendants' default in answering or appearing (See Gordon Law Firm, P.C. v Premier DNA Corp.,

205 AD3d 416,416 [1st Dept 2022]). Where service of process has been effected through the New

York Secretary of State, CPLR 3215(g)(4) further mandates that plaintiff must also submit an

affidavit of service documenting an additional service of the summons to defendant's last known

address by first-class mail (See e.g., Sterk-Kirch v Uptown Communications & Elec. Inc., 124

AD3d 413,414 [1st Dept 2015]).

The motion is denied as to defendants Glenmore Medical, PC, and Macintosh Medical, PC,

as this action has been discontinued against them by stipulation (See NYSCEF Doc. No. 121, 125).

The motion is also denied as to defendants Samir Zaqdan a/k/a Samir Mohamed Hanafy Zadqan

DPT and Future Care Registered Professional Nursing PLLC d/b/a Future Care Internal Medicine,

as plaintiff has not established that it served the amended summons and complaint on them and

153731/2022 HEREFORD INSURANCE COMPANY vs. A TO Z SUPPLY SERVICES, INC. ET AL Page 2 of 5 Motion No. 004

2 of 5 [* 2] INDEX NO. 153731/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 127 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/07/2024

submits only affidavits of non-service (See NYSCEF Doc. No. 118) which are, of course,

insufficient to do so (See Sanchez v Rosendo, 16 Misc 3d 1115(A) [Sup Ct, Kings County 2007]).

Finally, the motion is denied as to defendant Caplet Pharmacy Inc, as the affidavit of service

submitted by plaintiff states only that defendant was served with a "Decision & Order with Notice

of Entry" via the New York State Secretary of State without reference to the amended summons

and complaint or any indication that these documents were included in such service (See NYSCEF

Doc. No. 83).

The motion is granted, however, as to Downtown Brooklyn PT, PC; All Health DME Inc;

Bingo Supplies Inc, Fontto Supply Services Inc; Hunt Supply Inc; Lincoln Diagnostics; Lit

Chemists Corp; Open Acupuncture, PC; Rehab Concepts Physical Therapy PC; and Vargas RX

Corp DBA 14th St Pharmacy. Plaintiff has established its service of the summons and complaint

upon these defendants and its compliance with the additional service requirements pursuant to

CPLR 3215(g)( 4). 1 Plaintiff has further provided proof of the facts constituting the claim through

the affidavit of Joronda McBumie, who attests to the failure of defendants Orlando Covington and

Darius Covington to subscribe their EUO transcripts (See~' State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v Atl.

Diagnostic, L.L.C., 82 Misc 3d 1229(A) [Sup Ct, NY County 2024]) and Leona Stokes' failure to

appear for scheduled IME' s on two occasions, in violation of 11 NYCRR 65-1.1 (See ~ ' Am.

Tr. Ins. Co. v Smart Choice Med., P.C., 217 AD3d 492 [1st Dept 2023]). 2

Accordingly, it is

1 The affidavit of service upon defendant Open Acupuncture, PC was not included as an exhibit to this motion but was filed on NYSCEF on May 9, 2024 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 109).

2 The affidavit of Joronda McBurnie was not included as an exhibit to this motion but was an exhibit submitted with plaintiff's first motion for a default judgment (NYSCEF. Doc. No. 49). 153731/2022 HEREFORD INSURANCE COMPANY vs. A TO Z SUPPLY SERVICES, INC. ET AL Page 3 of 5 Motion No. 004

3 of 5 [* 3] INDEX NO. 153731/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 127 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/07/2024

ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for a default judgment as against defendants Glenmore

Medical, PC, and Macintosh Medical, PC, is denied, as moot; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for a default judgment as against Samir Zaqdan a/k/a

Samir Mohamed Hanafy Zadqan DPT; Future Care Registered Professional Nursing PLLC d/b/a

Future Care Internal Medicine; and Caplet Pharmacy Inc. is denied; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for default judgment as to Downtown Brooklyn PT,

PC, All Health DME Inc; Bingo Supplies Inc., Fontto Supply Services Inc, Hunt Supply Inc,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sterk-Kirch v. Uptown Communications & Electric, Inc.
124 A.D.3d 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Gordon Law Firm, P.C. v. Premier DNA Corp.
205 A.D.3d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 33545(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hereford-ins-co-v-a-to-z-supply-servs-inc-nysupctnewyork-2024.