Herd v. Herd

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Herd v. Herd

391 So. 2d 312, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17826

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 10, 1980

DocketNo. 80-1549

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 391 So. 2d 312 (Herd v. Herd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herd v. Herd, 391 So. 2d 312, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17826 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before us for review of an interlocutory order as to the parties’ temporary rights of custody and visitation with their three year old child. Although we have serious reservations about the specific arrangements approved by the trial court, we do not believe appellant has demonstrated an abuse of discretion, especially in view of the fact that such arrangements are to be in effect only until a final judgment of dissolution is entered.

The record is silent as to why this matter has not been finally disposed of and we would hope that it can be at the earliest opportunity. At that time we are hopeful a solution satisfactory to all will be found, predicated upon the best interests of the child. If not, we will then be in a position to entertain a plenary appeal with more complete information before us.

LETTS, C. J., and ANSTEAD- and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before us for review of an interlocutory order as to the parties’ temporary rights of custody and visitation with their three year old child. Although we have serious reservations about the specific arrangements approved by the trial court, we do not believe appellant has demonstrated an abuse of discretion, especially in view of the fact that such arrangements are to be in effect only until a final judgment of dissolution is entered.

The record is silent as to why this matter has not been finally disposed of and we would hope that it can be at the earliest opportunity. At that time we are hopeful a solution satisfactory to all will be found, predicated upon the best interests of the child. If not, we will then be in a position to entertain a plenary appeal with more complete information before us.

LETTS, C. J., and ANSTEAD- and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

391 So. 2d 312, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herd-v-herd-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack