Herd v. Bissel
1 Root 260
Opinion
But
Parol evidence may not be admitted to contradict the writing, which must speak for itself; and the receipt and indorsement are so different dates, and for different sums. ' . '
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herd v. Bissel, 1 Root 260 (Colo. 1791).
1 Root 260 (Herd v. Bissel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barnum v. Barnum
9 Conn. 250 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1832)