Hercules, Inc. v. Carter
This text of 419 S.E.2d 438 (Hercules, Inc. v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UPON REHEARING EN BANC
Opinion
In Hercules, Inc. v. Carter, 13 Va. App. 219, 409 S.E.2d 637 (1991), a majority of a panel of the Court affirmed an award of the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission 1 that reinstated the claimant’s compensation benefits after he cured his unjustified refusal of selective employment. 2 We granted Hercules a rehearing and heard the case en banc on March 17, 1992. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the panel’s majority opinion, the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission is affirmed. Accordingly, the stay of this Court’s mandate issued October 8, 1991 is *887 lifted.
Judge Moon would reverse the commission’s decision for the reasons stated in his dissent to the panel opinion. See id. at 225, 409 S.E.2d at 640.
Formerly the Industrial Commission of Virginia.
This appeal did not raise the issue, and consequently we do not decide, whether a claimant is entitled to have compensation benefits reinstated effective from the date the suspension is declared by the commission to have been lifted or retroactively to the date that the employee cured his unjustified refusal of selective employment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 S.E.2d 438, 14 Va. App. 886, 9 Va. Law Rep. 81, 1992 Va. App. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hercules-inc-v-carter-vactapp-1992.