Hercules Div. of the Cleveland Welding Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Hercules Div. of the Cleveland Welding Co. v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 639, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1780

DecidedAugust 26, 1968

DocketNo. P68/341; protest 289728-K (Tampa); No. P68/342; protest 305436-K (New York); No. P68/343; protest 313389-14-14710 (New Orleans); No. P68/344; protests 58/4939, etc. (Galveston); No. P68/345; protest 59/2861 (Los Angeles); No. P68/346; protest 59/8389 (New York); No. P68/347; protest 59/18980 (Seattle); No. P68/348; protest 60/2885 (New York); No. P68/349; protest 60/3555 (New York); No. P68/350; protest 60/3556 (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 61 Cust. Ct. 639 (Hercules Div. of the Cleveland Welding Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hercules Div. of the Cleveland Welding Co. v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 639, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1780 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, 'and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, 'and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Cust. Ct. 639, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hercules-div-of-the-cleveland-welding-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.