Hercules Div. American Machine & Foundry Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Hercules Div. American Machine & Foundry Co. v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 643

DecidedAugust 30, 1968

DocketNo. P68/365; protest 60/7534 (Houston); No. P68/366; protests 60/13096, etc. (New York); No. P68/367; protests 60/26170, etc. (New York); No. P68/368; protests 61/1794, etc. (New York); No. P68/369; protest 61/2046 (Baltimore); No. P68/370; protest 61/4703 (Philadelphia); No. P68/371; protest 61/5005 (Tampa); No. P68/372; protest 61/5006 (Tampa); No. P68/373; protest 62/11422-12912 (Chicago); No. P68/374; protest 62/18599-13062 (Chicago)

StatusPublished

This text of 61 Cust. Ct. 643 (Hercules Div. American Machine & Foundry Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hercules Div. American Machine & Foundry Co. v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 643 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cyeles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cyeles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Cust. Ct. 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hercules-div-american-machine-foundry-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.