Herbst v. Brown
This text of 23 F. App'x 84 (Herbst v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[85]*85 SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the decision of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Appellant-plaintiff Richard C. Herbst appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Lewis A. Kaplan, Judge), entered May 23, 2001, dismissing Herbst’s complaint with prejudice for failure to comply with various court orders. We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing plaintiffs complaint. For substantially the same reasons as set forth by the district court in its order, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 F. App'x 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbst-v-brown-ca2-2002.