Herbin v. Woods
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6071
THOMAS LARRY HERBIN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
DON WOODS, Superintendent,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-hc-02191-FL)
Submitted: July 27, 2007 Decided: August 10, 2007
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Larry Herbin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Thomas Larry Herbin seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Herbin seeks to appeal
is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. See Miller v. Simmons, 814 F.2d 962, 964 (4th
Cir. 1987). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herbin v. Woods (Herbin v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.