Herbert Windsor and Baeda E. Windsor v. United States
184 F.2d 184
This text of 184 F.2d 184 (Herbert Windsor and Baeda E. Windsor v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Herbert Windsor and Baeda E. Windsor v. United States, 184 F.2d 184 (9th Cir. 1950).
Opinion
The question presented by this appeal is whether the District Court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous. See Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. They are not. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
184 F.2d 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-windsor-and-baeda-e-windsor-v-united-states-ca9-1950.