Herbert Vince Arceneaux v. State

Opinion

The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 14, 2014

No. 04-13-00830-CR

Herbert Vince ARCENEAUX, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011CR4163 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant has filed a pro se brief. Appellant is represented by Mr. Michael Raign. In Texas, appellants do not have a right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). It is therefore ORDRED that appellant’s pro se brief is STRICKEN.

By order dated March 19, 2014, this court granted the second motion for extension of time filed by Mr. Raign. Our order stated that appellant’s brief must be filed by April 14, 2014. Our order further stated, “THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE APPELLANT WILL BE GRANTED.” This order does not extend the deadline set forth in our prior order.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of April, 2014.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court