Herbert v. W. C. Mahon Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Herbert v. W. C. Mahon Co.

211 Ill. App. 297

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMay 14, 1918

DocketGen. No. 23,430

StatusPublished

This text of 211 Ill. App. 297 (Herbert v. W. C. Mahon Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herbert v. W. C. Mahon Co., 211 Ill. App. 297 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Sales, § 141* — when seller liable for negligence in selection of articles. In an action by the purchaser of a sealskin coat to recover the purchase price paid thereon on account of defects in the dyes used, even though defendant’s contention, that as the sale was one of a specified article under its patent or trade name there could be no implied warranty of its fitness for any particular purpose, was conceded, defendant might still be held liable for negligence in its selection of the articles delivered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Sales, § 141* — when seller liable for negligence in selection of articles. In an action by the purchaser of a sealskin coat to recover the purchase price paid thereon on account of defects in the dyes used, even though defendant’s contention, that as the sale was one of a specified article under its patent or trade name there could be no implied warranty of its fitness for any particular purpose, was conceded, defendant might still be held liable for negligence in its selection of the articles delivered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 Ill. App. 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-v-w-c-mahon-co-illappct-1918.