Herbert v. . Vaughan

1 N.C. 638
CourtCourt of King's Bench
DecidedJuly 5, 1793
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 638 (Herbert v. . Vaughan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herbert v. . Vaughan, 1 N.C. 638 (kingsbench 1793).

Opinion

In the court of Montgomery, seventeen persons were indicted for murder, in a quarrel between Herbert and Vaughan, and they were imprisoned. They were persons of such power and influence in the country that a jury could not be got to try them; whereupon Master Littleton moved for a certiorari to have them tried in Shropshire, and alleged precedents in like cases. The court granted a certiorari, and the indictments being removed in the King's Bench, at Trinity term, he moved for an habeas corpora to remove their bodies also, which was granted. And at Michaelmas term afterwards the prisoners were bailed, although they were indicted for murder, which is contrary to the statute; which it was held is capable of a favorable construction at the discretion of the Judges, as in this case, because the prisoners were in danger of starving in gaol, and the trial could not be had soon. Pp. 118 and 166.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-v-vaughan-kingsbench-1793.