Herbert v. Varner
42 Ala. 182
Opinion
A. J. WALKER, C. J.
The matter of defense set up by motion affected the validity of the service of the process, [184]*184and the ruling of the court upon it could only be revisable here when it was pleaded in the court below. — Nabors v. Nabors, 2 Porter, 162; Roberts v. Beesan, 4 Porter, 164; Mitchell v. Allen, 2 S. & P. 247 ; Sawyer v. Price, 6 Ala. 285.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herbert v. Varner, 42 Ala. 182 (Ala. 1868).
42 Ala. 182 (Herbert v. Varner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sawyer v. Price
6 Ala. 285 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1844)
Nabors v. Nabors
2 Port. 162 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1835)
Roberts v. Beeson
4 Port. 164 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1836)