Herbert v. Varner

42 Ala. 182
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1868
StatusPublished

This text of 42 Ala. 182 (Herbert v. Varner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herbert v. Varner, 42 Ala. 182 (Ala. 1868).

Opinion

A. J. WALKER, C. J.

The matter of defense set up by motion affected the validity of the service of the process, [184]*184and the ruling of the court upon it could only be revisable here when it was pleaded in the court below. — Nabors v. Nabors, 2 Porter, 162; Roberts v. Beesan, 4 Porter, 164; Mitchell v. Allen, 2 S. & P. 247 ; Sawyer v. Price, 6 Ala. 285.

Affirmed.

Judge, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sawyer v. Price
6 Ala. 285 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1844)
Nabors v. Nabors
2 Port. 162 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1835)
Roberts v. Beeson
4 Port. 164 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1836)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 Ala. 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-v-varner-ala-1868.