Herbert v. Tecnomark Service, Inc.
496 So. 2d 190, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10017
This text of 496 So. 2d 190 (Herbert v. Tecnomark Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Herbert v. Tecnomark Service, Inc., 496 So. 2d 190, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10017 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
Opinion
Finding no basis for affording appellants the benefit of their unperformed contract, we affirm the trial court’s order denying their motion to dissolve the temporary injunction previously affirmed in Herbert v. Tecnomark Service, Inc., 461 So.2d 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). See Superior Uniforms, Inc. v. Brown, 211 So.2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Superior Uniforms, Inc. v. Brown
211 So. 2d 50 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
496 So. 2d 190, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-v-tecnomark-service-inc-fladistctapp-1986.