Herbert v. Tecnomark Service, Inc.
496 So. 2d 190, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10017
Opinion
Finding no basis for affording appellants the benefit of their unperformed contract, we affirm the trial court’s order denying their motion to dissolve the temporary injunction previously affirmed in Herbert v. Tecnomark Service, Inc., 461 So.2d 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). See Superior Uniforms, Inc. v. Brown, 211 So.2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herbert v. Tecnomark Service, Inc., 496 So. 2d 190, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10017 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
496 So. 2d 190 (Herbert v. Tecnomark Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Superior Uniforms, Inc. v. Brown
211 So. 2d 50 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)