Herbert v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Herbert v. State

1913 OK CR 50, 128 P. 910, 8 Okla. Crim. 737, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 1

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 13, 1913·No. No. A-1494.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, James Herbert, was tried and convicted in tie county court of Canadian county on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and was on tie 2nd day of September, 1911, sentenced to pay a.-fine of two hundred dollars and serve 30 days in the county jail. Upon a careful examination of tie record and tie briefs on both sides in this case we are of tie opinion that tie judgment should be affirmed. The only question urged is tie insufficiency of tie evidence. We cannot say as a matter of law that the verdict is contrary to tie evidence. Tie judgment of tie trial court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, James Herbert, was tried and convicted in tie county court of Canadian county on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and was on tie 2nd day of September, 1911, sentenced to pay a.-fine of two hundred dollars and serve 30 days in the county jail. Upon a careful examination of tie record and tie briefs on both sides in this case we are of tie opinion that tie judgment should be affirmed. The only question urged is tie insufficiency of tie evidence. We cannot say as a matter of law that the verdict is contrary to tie evidence. Tie judgment of tie trial court is therefore affirmed.

Herbert v. State, 1913 OK CR 50, 128 P. 910, 8 Okla. Crim. 737, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 1 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

1913 OK CR 50 (Herbert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.