Herbert v. Spurlock
This text of 26 Miss. 180 (Herbert v. Spurlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
After the pleadings had become quite complicated, the defendant below obtained leave to demur to the complaint. This demurrer, having been filed, was overruled. This proceeding was a complete waiver of all irregularities, if any, previously committed by the parties or by the court.
The court permitted the defendant, after overruling the demurrer, to file an answer without an affidavit of merits.
The cause was finally put to a jury, who found a verdict for the plaintiff below, in which we find no error.
The evidence introduced to establish the credit on the note was properly rejected, as the defendant could only avail himself of it in the justices’ court, where he had succeeded once in defeating, the action. We find no error in the record.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 Miss. 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-v-spurlock-miss-1853.