Herbert v. SanFeliz

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 18, 2025·No. 7:22-cv-04299·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JEREMIAH FOLSOM HERBERT,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 22-CV-4299 (KMK)

CHRISTINA SANFELIZ, DEVINNIE M. ORDER OF SERVICE DEPUY, CHRISTOPHER FOX, and ANDREW KINDERMAN,

Defendants.

KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge:

Plaintiff, who is currently incarcerated and proceeding pro se, brings this Action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants violated his constitutional rights. By order dated June 10, 2022, Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees, was granted. On March 21, 2025, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. (See Op. (Dkt. No. 89).) Plaintiff timely filed a Second Amended Complaint, in which he added a new Defendant, Andrew Kinderman (“Kinderman”). (See SAC (Dkt. No. 102).) Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. See Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Kinderman through the U.S. Marshals Service (“Marshals”), the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for Kinderman. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals to effect service upon Kinderman. If the Second Amended Complaint is not served within 90 days after the date summonses are issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiffs responsibility to request an extension of time for service). Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. The Clerk of Court is instructed to issue a summons for Kinderman, complete the USM- 285 form with the address for Kinderman, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the Marshals. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 18, 2025 4h White Plains, New York { KENNETH □□ KARAS) United States District Judge

DEFENDANT AND SERVICE ADDRESS

1. Andrew Kinderman New York State Police 5754 State Route 55 Liberty, NY 12754

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herbert v. SanFeliz, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Herbert v. SanFeliz (Herbert v. SanFeliz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meilleur v. Strong
682 F.3d 56 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Walker v. Schult
717 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2013)