Herbert v. Morgan Drive-A-Way, Inc.

650 N.E.2d 1316, 85 N.Y.2d 895, 627 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 2245
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 30, 1995·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, motion by defendants Morgan Drive-A-Way, Inc. and Errol K. Miller for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of plaintiffs Batoul Herbert and Donald Herbert as against them in action No. 1 denied and certified question answered in the affirmative for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Paul J. Yesawich, Jr., at the Appellate Division (202 AD2d 886, 888-889).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herbert v. Morgan Drive-A-Way, Inc., 650 N.E.2d 1316, 85 N.Y.2d 895, 627 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 2245 (N.Y. 1995).

650 N.E.2d 1316 (Herbert v. Morgan Drive-A-Way, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bus Co.
127 A.D.3d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Batal v. Associated Universities, Inc.
293 A.D.2d 558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Lester v. Chmaj
251 A.D.2d 1069 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Gage v. Raffensperger
234 A.D.2d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)