Herbert v. District of Columbia

698 A.2d 1017, 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 175, 1997 WL 428992

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided July 31, 1997·No. No. 93-CV-407·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[1018]*1018ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the petition of appel-lee, District of Columbia, for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and appellant’s response thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en bane, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of April 10, 1997, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before August 8,1997.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1018]*1018ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the petition of appel-lee, District of Columbia, for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and appellant’s response thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en bane, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of April 10, 1997, are hereby vacated. It is

Herbert v. District of Columbia, 698 A.2d 1017, 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 175, 1997 WL 428992 (D.C. 1997).

Pincite

698 A.2d 1017 (Herbert v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Herbert v. District of Columbia

716 A.2d 196 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1998)

Opinion

Related