Herbert v. Corby
17 A.2d 541, 125 N.J.L. 502, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 368
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Herbert v. Corby. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 N.J.L. 249 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — HEHER, PERSKIE, DEAR, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 6.
For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, WELLS, JJ. 5. *Page 503
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herbert v. Corby, 17 A.2d 541, 125 N.J.L. 502, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 368 (N.J. 1940).
17 A.2d 541 (Herbert v. Corby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.