Herbert v. Butterworth
This text of 23 Tex. 250 (Herbert v. Butterworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the authority of Graham v. Stephen, 15 Texas Rep. 88, and Bradley v. Bradley, 13 Texas Rep. [252]*252263, it must be held, that the. court erred in sustaining the exceptions to the part of the fourth and sixth answers of the defendant to interrogatories, stricken out. The answer dealt very-much in generalities; and on that ground, perhaps, was objectionable. But it was not obnoxious to the objection, that it was not closely connected with the main fact to which the party was interrogated. The judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Bell, J., did not sit in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 Tex. 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-v-butterworth-tex-1859.