Herbert v. Butterworth

23 Tex. 250
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1859·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wheeler, C. J.

On the authority of Graham v. Stephen, 15 Texas Rep. 88, and Bradley v. Bradley, 13 Texas Rep. [252]*252263, it must be held, that the. court erred in sustaining the exceptions to the part of the fourth and sixth answers of the defendant to interrogatories, stricken out. The answer dealt very-much in generalities; and on that ground, perhaps, was objectionable. But it was not obnoxious to the objection, that it was not closely connected with the main fact to which the party was interrogated. The judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Bell, J., did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herbert v. Butterworth, 23 Tex. 250 (Tex. 1859).

23 Tex. 250 (Herbert v. Butterworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lufkin Land & Lumber Co. v. Noble
127 S.W. 1093 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1910)