Herbert T. Williams v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

Ninth Circuit

Herbert T. Williams v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

453 F.2d 397

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 17, 1972

Docket71-1983

StatusPublished

This text of 453 F.2d 397 (Herbert T. Williams v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herbert T. Williams v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare, 453 F.2d 397 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court in a proceeding for a review of the final decision of the ap-pellee under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The district court found that the administrative decision was supported by substantial evidence. We agree.

A review of the facts would add nothing to the judicial literature on the subject. We are bound by the findings of the secretary as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Steimer v. Gardner, 395 F.2d 197 (9th Cir. 1968); Mark v. Celebrezze, 348 F.2d 289 (9th Cir. 1965). Our independent examination of the record discloses substantial evidence in support of the findings of the secretary and the decision of the district court. Consequently, the judgment of the district court must be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court in a proceeding for a review of the final decision of the ap-pellee under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The district court found that the administrative decision was supported by substantial evidence. We agree.

A review of the facts would add nothing to the judicial literature on the subject. We are bound by the findings of the secretary as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Steimer v. Gardner, 395 F.2d 197 (9th Cir. 1968); Mark v. Celebrezze, 348 F.2d 289 (9th Cir. 1965). Our independent examination of the record discloses substantial evidence in support of the findings of the secretary and the decision of the district court. Consequently, the judgment of the district court must be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

453 F.2d 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-t-williams-v-elliot-l-richardson-secretary-of-health-education-ca9-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack