Herbert Schellenbarg and Clara Schellenbarg v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

283 F.2d 871, 6 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5727, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3518
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 21, 1960·No. 14089_1·Published

Opinion

ORDER.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties *872 and argument of counsel in open court, .and the court being duly advised,

\ Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the decision of the Tax Court be and is hereby affirmed, except as to the double imposition of additions to tax, for failure to file an estimated tax return, and for substantial under-estimation of estimated tax. It is conceded by respondent that under the authority of Acker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 6 Cir., 258 F.2d 568, affirmed by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Acker, 361 U.S. 87, 80 S.Ct. 144, 4 L.Ed.2d 127, such double imposition of additions to tax is invalid. The case is, accordingly, remanded to the Tax Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. 31 T.C. 1269.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herbert Schellenbarg and Clara Schellenbarg v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 283 F.2d 871, 6 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5727, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3518 (6th Cir. 1960).

283 F.2d 871 (Herbert Schellenbarg and Clara Schellenbarg v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commissioner v. Acker
361 U.S. 87 (Supreme Court, 1959)
Fred N. Acker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
258 F.2d 568 (Sixth Circuit, 1958)
Schellenbarg v. Commissioner
31 T.C. 1269 (U.S. Tax Court, 1959)