Herbert Pate v. Dade County School Board, Defendants-Appellees-Cross v. Alice Love, Carswell Washington, Intervenors-Appellants, Cross
Opinion
430 F.2d 1175
Herbert PATE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD et al., Defendants-Appellees-Cross
Appellants, v. Alice LOVE, Carswell Washington et
al., Intervenors-Appellants, Cross Appellees.
No. 29179.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 28, 1970.
James W. Matthews, Miami, Fla., for Love et al.
Larry S. Stewart, Miami, Fla., for Pate.
Claude R. Kirk, Jr., Governor, Tallahassee, Fla., for State of Florida.
Fred C. Davant, Miami, Fla., for Immerfall and Russell.
Jerris Leonard, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Washington, D.C., Gerald Mager, Legal Counsel to the Governor, tallahassee, Fla., for other appellants.
George C. Bolles, Miami, Fla., for Dade County School Board.
William C. Cramer, Washington, D.C., amicus curiae.
ON SUGGESTION FOR HEARING EN BANC
ORDER:
No Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on hearing en banc (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12), the Petition for Hearing En Banc is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
430 F.2d 1175 (Herbert Pate v. Dade County School Board, Defendants-Appellees-Cross v. Alice Love, Carswell Washington, Intervenors-Appellants, Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.