Herbert Parmer, Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 11, 2010
Docket07-10-00145-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Herbert Parmer, Jr. v. State (Herbert Parmer, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herbert Parmer, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

NO. 07-10-00145-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

MAY 11, 2010

HERBERT PARMER, JR., APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF FREESTONE COUNTY;

NO. 22436; HONORABLE LINDA K. GRANT, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Herbert Parmer, Jr. seeks to appeal a judgment convicting him of

indecent exposure and imposing on him a sentence of 120 days jail time with credit for

time served and court costs. The judgment included in the clerk’s record indicates

sentence was imposed on August 10, 2009. His motion for new trial and notice of

appeal were filed in the trial court on September 11, 2009. By letter, this Court informed appellant that the notice of appeal did not appear

timely and directed him to file any documents or matters considered necessary for the

Court to determine its appellate jurisdiction. No response has been received.

Our appellate jurisdiction is triggered through a timely notice of appeal. Olivo v.

State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App.1996). Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2(a)

requires a notice of appeal be filed within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed in

open court, or within 90 days after imposition of the sentence if a timely motion for new

trial is filed. The motion for new trial was not timely filed in this case.

The rules of appellate procedure provide for an extension of time to file the

notice of appeal if "such notice is filed within fifteen days after the last day allowed and

within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the

need for such extension." Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Both the notice of appeal and the

extension motion must be filed within the time provided by the rules. See Slaton v.

State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522.

Appellant’s notice of appeal, filed more than thirty days after imposition of sentence in

open court, without a motion for extension, was untimely.

The appropriate vehicle for seeking an out-of-time appeal is by writ of habeas

corpus from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals pursuant to Code of Criminal

Procedure article 11.07. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon 2007); Portley

v. State, 89 S.W.3d 188, 190 (Tex.App.—(Texarkana 2002, no pet.). Because

appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely, this Court has no jurisdiction to take any

2 action but to dismiss the appeal. Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210; see Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at

522.

Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

James T. Campbell Justice

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Portley v. State
89 S.W.3d 188 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Herbert Parmer, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-parmer-jr-v-state-texapp-2010.