Herbert Lawrence Polinard, Jr. v. Jo Ann Karambis, Margaret Comparin Karambis, Ronaldo Dunagan, Lynda C. Spence, and eXp Realty LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 17, 2021
Docket04-21-00251-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Herbert Lawrence Polinard, Jr. v. Jo Ann Karambis, Margaret Comparin Karambis, Ronaldo Dunagan, Lynda C. Spence, and eXp Realty LLC (Herbert Lawrence Polinard, Jr. v. Jo Ann Karambis, Margaret Comparin Karambis, Ronaldo Dunagan, Lynda C. Spence, and eXp Realty LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herbert Lawrence Polinard, Jr. v. Jo Ann Karambis, Margaret Comparin Karambis, Ronaldo Dunagan, Lynda C. Spence, and eXp Realty LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 17, 2021

No. 04-21-00251-CV

Herbert Lawrence POLINARD, Jr., Appellant

v.

Jo Ann KARAMBIS, Margaret Comparin Karambis, Ronaldo Dunagan, Lynda C. Spence, and eXp Realty LLC, Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018-CI-11887 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Because it appeared the notice of appeal was potentially untimely filed, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by September 10, 2021, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant responded with a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Accordingly, we deem the notice of appeal timely filed and retain the appeal on the docket of this court.

Appellant’s brief remains due on or before September 24, 2021. Appellant’s brief must comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.1, 9.4, 9.5, 9.9, 38.1. Among other requirements, appellant’s brief must contain appropriate citations to authorities and must contain proper record citations to any documents referenced in the brief. See id. R. 34.1, 38.1(g), (i). This court will not consider any documents included in an appendix to appellant’s brief that are not contained in the clerk’s record. See Blank v. State, 172 S.W.3d 673, 675 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2005, no pet.) (not designated for publication).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice FILE COPY

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of September, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)
Blank v. State
172 S.W.3d 673 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Herbert Lawrence Polinard, Jr. v. Jo Ann Karambis, Margaret Comparin Karambis, Ronaldo Dunagan, Lynda C. Spence, and eXp Realty LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-lawrence-polinard-jr-v-jo-ann-karambis-margaret-comparin-texapp-2021.