Herbert L. v. Kuttner
This text of 59 Misc. 224 (Herbert L. v. Kuttner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs filed a verified complaint and the defendant filed a verified answer herein. The plaintiffs’ attorney, on the day set for trial, moved for judgment on the pleadings upon the ground that the answer did not deny the allegations of the complaint. The defendant thereupon moved to be allowed to amend the answer, which motion was denied and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. This was error. The defendant should have been allowed to amend if his answer was insufficient. Munic. Gt. Act, § 166. '
Present: Gildersleeve, Giegerich and Greenbaum, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 Misc. 224, 110 N.Y.S. 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-l-v-kuttner-nyappterm-1908.