Herbert L. Joseph & Co. v. Perkins

Appellate Court of Illinois

Herbert L. Joseph & Co. v. Perkins

161 Ill. App. 412, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 760

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided May 4, 1911·No. Gen. No. 15,590·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error brought a suit in attachment against defendants in error on the ground Mrs. Perkins was about to remove her property from the State, etc. The cause was submitted to the court, without a jury, who found for the plaintiff in error on the merits and entered judgment for $179. On the attachment issue the court found for defendants in error and quashed the attachment, of which plaintiff in error complains.

The question was one of fact for the court, and while the testimony was not clear and satisfactory as might be desired, we are not disposed to disturb the finding.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error brought a suit in attachment against defendants in error on the ground Mrs. Perkins was about to remove her property from the State, etc. The cause was submitted to the court, without a jury, who found for the plaintiff in error on the merits and entered judgment for $179. On the attachment issue the court found for defendants in error and quashed the attachment, of which plaintiff in error complains.

The question was one of fact for the court, and while the testimony was not clear and satisfactory as might be desired, we are not disposed to disturb the finding.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Herbert L. Joseph & Co. v. Perkins, 161 Ill. App. 412, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 760 (Ill. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

161 Ill. App. 412 (Herbert L. Joseph & Co. v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.