Herbert Kann Co. v. United States
This text of 48 Cust. Ct. 523 (Herbert Kann Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement involves footwear in chief value of rubber, imported from Japan on or about September 11,1959.
Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeal for decision upon stipulation, upon the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved and that such value, in each instance, is the invoice unit price, plus, prorated, the items identified on the invoice as inland freight and insurance, storage and hauling, lighterage and loading, and “other shipping charges.”
Judgment will issue accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 Cust. Ct. 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-kann-co-v-united-states-cusc-1962.