Herbert Harris, Inc. v. Transflorida Bank
459 So. 2d 1169, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2536, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16045
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 5, 1984·No. No. 84-1222·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court erred by entering a default against the appellants after they had filed their answer and affirmative defenses. Leon Shaffer Golnick Advertising, Inc. v. Cedar, 423 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Meyerson v. Block, 404 So.2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); and Board of Regents v. Hardin, 393 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.500(b) and (c).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herbert Harris, Inc. v. Transflorida Bank, 459 So. 2d 1169, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2536, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16045 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
459 So. 2d 1169 (Herbert Harris, Inc. v. Transflorida Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Irwindale Co., NV v. Three Islands Olympus
474 So. 2d 406 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)