Herbert H. Land, Jr., and John Edgar Land v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Herbert H. Land, Jr., and John Edgar Land v. United States

565 F.2d 355, 41 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1445, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 13223

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 3, 1978

Docket77-2163

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 565 F.2d 355 (Herbert H. Land, Jr., and John Edgar Land v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herbert H. Land, Jr., and John Edgar Land v. United States, 565 F.2d 355, 41 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1445, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 13223 (5th Cir. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this federal estate tax dispute, the Government valued property in a Louisiana estate at the time the taxpayers received a judgment of possession, asserting that judgment represented a “distribution” within the meaning of 26 U.S.C.A. § 2032(a)(1) (1967) (amended 1970, 1976). See Stoutz v. United States, 324 F.Supp. 197, 200-203 (E.D.La.1970), aff’d, 439 F.2d 1197 (5th Cir. 1971). The taxpayers would distinguish Stoutz on the ground that their rights under the judgment are subject to a usufruct in favor of the decedent’s husband. As the district court reasoned, however, the usu-fruct did not prevent the termination of the succession and the separation of the property from it.

We thus hold that when Louisiana taxpayers receive, as testamentary heirs to an estate, a judgment of possession, that judgment constitutes a “distribution” for fixing the date on which the property may be alternatively valued for federal tax purposes under 26 U.S.C.A. § 2032(a)(1) (1967) (amended 1970, 1976), even though another heir received a usufruct (analogous to a life estate in a common-law jurisdiction) in the property.

We affirm on the reasoning of the district court’s opinion in Land v. United States, 429 F.Supp. 545 (W.D.La.1977). Cf. Reardon v. United States, 565 F.2d 381 (5th Cir.), aff’g, 429 F.Supp. 540 (W.D.La.1977).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this federal estate tax dispute, the Government valued property in a Louisiana estate at the time the taxpayers received a judgment of possession, asserting that judgment represented a “distribution” within the meaning of 26 U.S.C.A. § 2032(a)(1) (1967) (amended 1970, 1976). See Stoutz v. United States, 324 F.Supp. 197, 200-203 (E.D.La.1970), aff’d, 439 F.2d 1197 (5th Cir. 1971). The taxpayers would distinguish Stoutz on the ground that their rights under the judgment are subject to a usufruct in favor of the decedent’s husband. As the district court reasoned, however, the usu-fruct did not prevent the termination of the succession and the separation of the property from it.

We thus hold that when Louisiana taxpayers receive, as testamentary heirs to an estate, a judgment of possession, that judgment constitutes a “distribution” for fixing the date on which the property may be alternatively valued for federal tax purposes under 26 U.S.C.A. § 2032(a)(1) (1967) (amended 1970, 1976), even though another heir received a usufruct (analogous to a life estate in a common-law jurisdiction) in the property.

We affirm on the reasoning of the district court’s opinion in Land v. United States, 429 F.Supp. 545 (W.D.La.1977). Cf. Reardon v. United States, 565 F.2d 381 (5th Cir.), aff’g, 429 F.Supp. 540 (W.D.La.1977).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

565 F.2d 355, 41 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1445, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 13223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-h-land-jr-and-john-edgar-land-v-united-states-ca5-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack