Herbert ex rel. Herbert v. Union Pacific Corp.

176 So. 3d 1107, 2014 La.App. 3 Cir. 1311, 2015 La. App. LEXIS 742
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided April 15, 2015·No. Nos. 14-1311·Published

Opinion

KEATY, Judge.

hFor the reasons set forth in the companion and consolidated case hereto, Ned v. Union Pacific Corp., 14-1310 (La.App. 3 Cir.4/15/15), 176 So.3d 1095, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herbert ex rel. Herbert v. Union Pacific Corp., 176 So. 3d 1107, 2014 La.App. 3 Cir. 1311, 2015 La. App. LEXIS 742 (La. Ct. App. 2015).

176 So. 3d 1107 (Herbert ex rel. Herbert v. Union Pacific Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ned v. Union Pacific Corp.
176 So. 3d 1095 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)