Herbert A. Morriss, Jr., and George C. Howard v. Georesearch, Inc.

298 F.2d 442
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 27, 1962·No. 19182_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon careful consideration of the contentions made by the appellants, we conclude that the judgment of the trial court was correct for the reasons set out in the able opinion written by the District Judge.

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the trial court. See D.C., 193 F.Supp. 163.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herbert A. Morriss, Jr., and George C. Howard v. Georesearch, Inc., 298 F.2d 442 (5th Cir. 1962).

298 F.2d 442 (Herbert A. Morriss, Jr., and George C. Howard v. Georesearch, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neeb-Kearney and Co., Inc. v. Rellstab
593 So. 2d 741 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1992)
Brock v. Mutual Reports, Inc.
397 A.2d 149 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)