Herber v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Herber v. State

1913 OK CR 324, 133 P. 1196, 10 Okla. Crim. 636, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 282

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 12, 1913

DocketNo. A-1549.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 324 (Herber v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herber v. State, 1913 OK CR 324, 133 P. 1196, 10 Okla. Crim. 636, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 282 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff 'in error, Joe I-Ierber, was convicted under an information which charged that J. L. I-Iallock and Joe Herber did have the possession of ten quarts of whisky with the intent to sell said liquor, contrary to law. When the case was called for trial, the defendant Hallock failed to appear. The jury returned a verdict find *637 ing the defendant Herber guilty as charged and assessed his punishment at confinement for thirty days in the county jail, and to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. September 23, 1911, the judgment and sentence was entered in accordance with the verdict. From, a careful examination of the record our conclusion is that the assignments of error are not well taken. The guilt of the defendant was established beyond any reasonable doubt. The judgment of the superior court of Logan county is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff 'in error, Joe I-Ierber, was convicted under an information which charged that J. L. I-Iallock and Joe Herber did have the possession of ten quarts of whisky with the intent to sell said liquor, contrary to law. When the case was called for trial, the defendant Hallock failed to appear. The jury returned a verdict find *637 ing the defendant Herber guilty as charged and assessed his punishment at confinement for thirty days in the county jail, and to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. September 23, 1911, the judgment and sentence was entered in accordance with the verdict. From, a careful examination of the record our conclusion is that the assignments of error are not well taken. The guilt of the defendant was established beyond any reasonable doubt. The judgment of the superior court of Logan county is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 324, 133 P. 1196, 10 Okla. Crim. 636, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herber-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.