Herbemont v. Bostick

4 S.C.L. 435
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 15, 1810
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 S.C.L. 435 (Herbemont v. Bostick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herbemont v. Bostick, 4 S.C.L. 435 (S.C. 1810).

Opinion

5th May, 1810.

Bay, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court. At the time the deed of conveyance was executed by the widow and daughter of Dr. Hailey, in quality of heir, the estate had been legally sold by Dr. Hailey’s executor, in pursuance of a power given by the last will of Dr. Hailey, empowering his executors, or the survivors of them, to sell. The pretended heir, then, had no estate, even admitting she might enter as heir. She could not rep-represent the testator in selliug this property, for it was already dis. posed of by his executor. The trust was executed. But she could not take as heir, but as residuary legatee, under the will. She could not represent the testator as heir, because he did not die intestate as to this property, or any other part of his estate. It is not a case within the meaning of the law relative to double conveyances.

New trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dubose v. Kell
89 S.E. 555 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 S.C.L. 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbemont-v-bostick-sc-1810.