Herbello v. Perez
This text of 754 So. 2d 840 (Herbello v. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jorge Luis HERBELLO, Appellant,
v.
Humberto PEREZ, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oscar Syger, Miami, for appellant.
Richard A. Sherman and Rosemary B. Wilder, Fort Lauderdale; Timothy Harrington and Stephen K. Katz, Miami, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, GODERICH, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
After carefully reviewing the record, we find that the alleged erroneous evidentiary ruling did not affect the outcome of the trial. Therefore, the error, if any, was harmless. § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999); Katos v. Cushing, 601 So.2d 612, 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)(holding that in a civil case the "test for harmful error is whether, but for such error, a different result may have been reached.").
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
754 So. 2d 840, 2000 WL 346169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbello-v-perez-fladistctapp-2000.