Herbeck v. Holdeman

163 So. 2d 766, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4218
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 1964·No. No. 4292·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In appellant-plaintiff’s action for damages for false arrest and malicious prosecution the trial court granted the defendant-appellee’s motion for summary judgment. The exhibits, including answers to interrogatories propounded to the plaintiff, reveal ample support of the defendant’s affirmative defense of “probable cause” for the action taken by defendant against the plaintiff with respect to alleged violation of special zoning restrictions. The affirmative defense of “advice of counsel” also appears to be sufficiently substantiated. The record as a whole reveals no reversible error of substantive or procedural law.

Affirmed.

WHITE, Acting C. J., and KANNER (ret.), J., and DOWNEY, JAMES C., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herbeck v. Holdeman, 163 So. 2d 766, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4218 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

163 So. 2d 766 (Herbeck v. Holdeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnston v. Revitz
358 So. 2d 108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Applestein v. Preston
335 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Toomey v. Tolin
311 So. 2d 678 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Austin v. Zayre Corp.
218 So. 2d 803 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)