Herald v. Hood

639 N.E.2d 109, 70 Ohio St. 3d 1210
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 28, 1994·No. No. 93-1864·Published

Opinion

Based upon our decision in Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870, wherein we applied the discovery rule for purposes of tolling the statute of limitations in child-sexual-abuse-repressed-memory cases, this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herald v. Hood, 639 N.E.2d 109, 70 Ohio St. 3d 1210 (Ohio 1994).

639 N.E.2d 109 (Herald v. Hood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ault v. Jasko
637 N.E.2d 870 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)