Herald Towers LLC v. Sun Lord International, Inc.

302 A.D.2d 306, 756 N.Y.S.2d 169, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1715
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 25, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 302 A.D.2d 306 (Herald Towers LLC v. Sun Lord International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herald Towers LLC v. Sun Lord International, Inc., 302 A.D.2d 306, 756 N.Y.S.2d 169, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1715 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Order, Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Judicial Department, entered June 12, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from, affirmed an order of Civil Court, New York County (Laurie Lau, J.), dated September 30, 2001, insofar as it denied petitioner landlord’s cross motion for summary judgment in this nonprimary residence holdover proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While it is true that the nominal tenant of the subject apartment is a corporate entity not entitled to a rent-stabilized renewal lease, respondent Moid alleges that the corporate tenancy was a fiction insisted upon by petitioner’s predecessor, and that the actual contemplated tenants of the apartment pursuant to the lease providing that “[t]he Apartment shall be occupied only by Tenant and the immediate family of Tenant, for living purposes only” (emphasis added), were, in fact, Moid himself and his immediate family. Inasmuch as the record provides evidentiary support for Mold’s position, including checks written by Moid personally over the course of some 20 years and accepted by petitioner as rent for the subject apartment, and the apartment, since the initial 1981 lease between petitioner and the corporate respondent, has evidently had no other actual tenants but Moid and his family, summary judg[307]*307ment, awarding petitioner possession of the apartment on non-primary residence grounds simply because the nominal tenant of record for the apartment is a corporation, was properly denied (cf. Avon Bard Co. v Aquarian Found., 260 AD2d 207, 211, appeal dismissed 93 NY2d 998). Indeed, it is significant that respondent’s name on the landlord’s prior nonpayment petition was specified as Qazi Moid doing business as Sun Lord International, indicating petitioner’s recognition of the individual tenant’s occupancy of the subject apartment. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fox v. 12 E. 88th LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 2289 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 A.D.2d 306, 756 N.Y.S.2d 169, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herald-towers-llc-v-sun-lord-international-inc-nyappdiv-2003.