Her, Inc. v. Barlow (In re Barlow)

Sixth Circuit

Her, Inc. v. Barlow (In re Barlow)

501 B.R. 685

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit·Decided November 14, 2013·No. BAP No. 13-8018·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION

GEORGE W. EMERSON, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue before the Panel on appeal is whether the bankruptcy court erred in determining that a district court judgment entered against Debtor David E. Barlow (“Debtor”) was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and applicable law, the Panel concludes that the bankruptcy court properly gave the district court’s findings preclusive effect as to whether the district court judgment was the result of the Debtor’s willful and malicious injury. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the bankruptcy court’s well-written opinion entered on September 26, 2012, HER, Inc. v. Barlow (In re Barlow), 478 B.R. 320 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2012), we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

GEORGE W. EMERSON, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue before the Panel on appeal is whether the bankruptcy court erred in determining that a district court judgment entered against Debtor David E. Barlow (“Debtor”) was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and applicable law, the Panel concludes that the bankruptcy court properly gave the district court’s findings preclusive effect as to whether the district court judgment was the result of the Debtor’s willful and malicious injury. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the bankruptcy court’s well-written opinion entered on September 26, 2012, HER, Inc. v. Barlow (In re Barlow), 478 B.R. 320 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2012), we affirm.

Her, Inc. v. Barlow (In re Barlow), 501 B.R. 685 (bap6 2013).

Pincite

501 B.R. 685 (Her, Inc. v. Barlow (In re Barlow)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related