Her, Inc. v. Barlow (In re Barlow)

Sixth Circuit

Her, Inc. v. Barlow (In re Barlow)

501 B.R. 685

CourtBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 14, 2013

DocketBAP No. 13-8018

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 501 B.R. 685 (Her, Inc. v. Barlow (In re Barlow)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Her, Inc. v. Barlow (In re Barlow), 501 B.R. 685 (bap6 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

GEORGE W. EMERSON, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue before the Panel on appeal is whether the bankruptcy court erred in determining that a district court judgment entered against Debtor David E. Barlow (“Debtor”) was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and applicable law, the Panel concludes that the bankruptcy court properly gave the district court’s findings preclusive effect as to whether the district court judgment was the result of the Debtor’s willful and malicious injury. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the bankruptcy court’s well-written opinion entered on September 26, 2012, HER, Inc. v. Barlow (In re Barlow), 478 B.R. 320 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2012), we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

GEORGE W. EMERSON, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue before the Panel on appeal is whether the bankruptcy court erred in determining that a district court judgment entered against Debtor David E. Barlow (“Debtor”) was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and applicable law, the Panel concludes that the bankruptcy court properly gave the district court’s findings preclusive effect as to whether the district court judgment was the result of the Debtor’s willful and malicious injury. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the bankruptcy court’s well-written opinion entered on September 26, 2012, HER, Inc. v. Barlow (In re Barlow), 478 B.R. 320 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2012), we affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

501 B.R. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/her-inc-v-barlow-in-re-barlow-bap6-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack