Hepting v. At&t Corporation

Ninth Circuit

Hepting v. At&t Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 20, 2008

Docket06-17132

StatusPublished

This text of Hepting v. At&t Corporation (Hepting v. At&t Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hepting v. At&t Corporation, (9th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of  Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; GREGORY HICKS; ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 06-17132 and  D.C. No. CV-06-00672-VRW WIRED NEWS; CONDENET INC., Intervenors, v. AT&T CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, and AT&T, INC., Defendant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Intervenor. 

11353 11354 HEPTING v. AT&T CORPORATION

TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of  Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; GREGORY HICKS, ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL, on Behalf of No. 06-17137 Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff D.C. No. CV-06-00672-VRW  in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Northern District of Plaintiffs-Appellees, California, San Francisco v. ORDER AT&T CORPORATION; AT&T, INC., Defendants, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant.  Filed August 21, 2008

Before: Harry Pregerson, Michael Daly Hawkins, and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In light of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-261, we remand this case to the district court. We retain jurisdiction over any further appeals. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of  Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; GREGORY HICKS; ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 06-17132 and  D.C. No. CV-06-00672-VRW WIRED NEWS; CONDENET INC., Intervenors, v. AT&T CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, and AT&T, INC., Defendant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Intervenor. 

11353 11354 HEPTING v. AT&T CORPORATION

TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of  Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; GREGORY HICKS, ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL, on Behalf of No. 06-17137 Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff D.C. No. CV-06-00672-VRW  in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Northern District of Plaintiffs-Appellees, California, San Francisco v. ORDER AT&T CORPORATION; AT&T, INC., Defendants, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant.  Filed August 21, 2008

Before: Harry Pregerson, Michael Daly Hawkins, and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In light of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-261, we remand this case to the district court. We retain jurisdiction over any further appeals. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Hepting v. At&t Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hepting-v-att-corporation-ca9-2008.