Hepburn's Lessee v. Levy
This text of 4 U.S. 189 (Hepburn's Lessee v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ejectment, for land in Lycoming county. In tbe charge to the jury, it was ruled—
— In the case of a lost warrant, it may be removed to other land, provided the removal affects no previous right; and if it is actually surveyed upon vacant land, returned into the land-office, and there accepted, it becomes an appropriation. If, however, any warrant issued, appropriating the land, before an actual survey upon the removed warrant, the right of such warrant must bo preferred. Tbe fact to be decided in the [190]*190present case, therefore, is, whether any warrant, particularly describing the land in question, was delivered by the defendant to the deputy-surveyor, before the survey was made for the plaintiff ? A vague, indescriptive warrant will not be sufficient to affect the plaintiff’s survey: and although fraud is said to vitiate every transaction; yet, the fraud of the deputy-surveyor cannot affect the rights of the defendant.
See Belt’s Lessee v. Levers, ante. p. 210.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 U.S. 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hepburns-lessee-v-levy-pa-1800.