Hepburn v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 15, 2025·No. 1D2024-2133·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2024-2133

DARRIUES PRINCE ALEXANDER HEPBURN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.

January 15, 2025

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Because the direct appeal from judgment and sentence is still pending review with the Florida Supreme Court, the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is premature. See Shirah v. State, 285 So. 3d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (denying petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel as premature because judgment and sentence had not yet become final).

ROBERTS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Darriues Prince Alexander Hepburn, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hepburn v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Hepburn v. State of Florida (Hepburn v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.