Hepburn v. State of Florida
This text of Hepburn v. State of Florida (Hepburn v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-2133 _____________________________
DARRIUES PRINCE ALEXANDER HEPBURN,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.
January 15, 2025
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. Because the direct appeal from judgment and sentence is still pending review with the Florida Supreme Court, the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is premature. See Shirah v. State, 285 So. 3d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (denying petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel as premature because judgment and sentence had not yet become final).
ROBERTS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Darriues Prince Alexander Hepburn, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hepburn v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hepburn-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.