Hepburn v. State

844 So. 2d 674, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5416, 2003 WL 1877347
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 16, 2003
DocketNo. 3D03-854
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 844 So. 2d 674 (Hepburn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hepburn v. State, 844 So. 2d 674, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5416, 2003 WL 1877347 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Although rule 3.800(a) allows a claim of illegal sentence to be raised at any time, it does not obviate the law of the case doctrine. See Brown v. State, 813 So.2d 132, 134 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Vaughan v. State, 765 So.2d 56 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Raley v. State, 675 So.2d 170, 173-74 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Galindez v. State
910 So. 2d 284 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
844 So. 2d 674, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5416, 2003 WL 1877347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hepburn-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.